A13 Bionic Vs Snapdragon 865

To Give Some Perspective, A13 Bionic Was Already 50% More Powerful Than Last Year’s Snapdragon 855.

The a14 bionic edges out the a13 by only 5%, however, not nearly as impressive as the previous results. Apple’s presentation claimed the a13 to be about 50% better than the snapdragon 855 soc and roughly around 35% better than the 855+ edition. This is because apple claimed that the a13 bionic chip is 50% more powerful than the previous generation snapdragon 855 chip.

The Processor Qualcomm Sm8250 Snapdragon 865 5G Has More Cores, The Maximum Frequency Of Qualcomm Sm8250 Snapdragon 865 5G Is Greater, That The Thermal Dissipation Power Of Apple A13 Bionic Is Less.

So we can reach to a conclusion that snapdragon 865 has reduced the performance gap to 25% with respect to a13’s performance. Still, the iphones remain on top. Here you will find detailed information about technical specs and benchmarks tests for each chipset.

For Example, When Playing A Game The More Powerful Cores Will Be Used To Increase Performance, Whereas Checking Email Will Use The Less Powerful Cores.

The difference between the snapdragon 865 and 865+ is similar with the latter scoring 6% higher. Cpu performance (out of 100%) snapdragon 865: While the snapdragon 865 got an overall score of 5,57,378, the a13 bionic scored 4,98,296.

More Ghz Is More Speed.

Snapdragon 865 vs a13 bionic comparison. In the cpu department, apple definitely has the lead over qualcomm. In terms of graphics, apple a13 bionic has apple a13 bionic gpu gpu and undefined.

Here You Will Find The Pros And Cons Of Each Chip, Technical Specs, And Comprehensive Tests In Benchmarks, Like Antutu And Geekbench.

Apple a13 bionic has a antutu benchmark score of 526466 and qualcomm snapdragon 865 has antutu score of 600051. Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. However, in areas like ai and ml, qualcomm has done a tremendous job and leapfrogged to at least a generation ahead.